• Polling

Battleground Constituents Initially Oppose Project 2025 by 40-points

Wednesday, August 28, 2024 By Gabriela Parra
Download Full Report

Poll: Project 2025 in the Battleground

This Navigator Research report contains polling data on the share of battleground constituents who are familiar with Project 2025, including support for it generally and for its specific policies, and which policies battleground constituents see as most likely to be implemented in a conservative administration.

Battleground constituents oppose Project 2025 by 30 points, though two in five are not yet familiar with it.


61 percent of battleground constituents report having seen, read, or heard “some” about Project 2025, with 26 percent who report having heard “a lot.” Most of what battleground constituents are hearing about the project are generally negative (19 percent), including that it is a threat to democracy (15 percent), frightening (15 percent), and extreme (12 percent). 

  • Project 2025 is initially underwater by 40 points (18 percent support – 58 percent oppose), including among over nine in ten Democrats (net -90; 2 percent support – 92 percent oppose), nearly half of independents (net -27; 21 percent support – 48 percent oppose), and is nearly evenly split among Republicans (net +5; 32 percent support – 27 percent oppose). Black battleground constituents have a particularly high opposition trailing only behind Democrats with 78 percent of Black battleground constituents disapproving of Project 2025.

Trump having total control over the Department of Justice leads among the most concerning potential outcomes of Project 2025.


The most concerning policies outlined in Project 2025 include allowing the president to have total control over the Department of Justice, allowing the government to monitor pregnancies and potentially prosecute them if they miscarry, and eliminating health care protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Over one in three battleground constituents feel the most concerning policy of Project 2025 is “allowing the president to have total control over the Department of Justice” (36 percent most concerning, 58 percent top three most concerning). Other concerning policies include; 

  • Allowing the government to monitor people’s pregnancies and to potentially prosecute them if they miscarry (13 percent most concerning, 46 percent top three most concerning);
  • Eliminating healthcare protections for people with pre-existing conditions (12 percent most concerning, 35 percent top three most concerning); and,
  • Allowing the president to fire thousands of federal civil servants and replace them with their own loyalists (8 percent most concerning, 34 percent top three most concerning).

Most battleground constituents believe their Republican incumbent would support the policies outlined in Project 2025.


51 percent of battleground constituents living in districts with a Republican incumbent believe it is at least somewhat likely their Republican incumbent supports policies outlined in Project 2025. The policies constituents believe are most likely to be enacted if Trump is elected are “allowing the president to fire thousands of federal civil servants and replace them with their own loyalists” (40 percent), “allowing the president to have total control over the Department of Justice” (35 percent), “cutting taxes for the ultra-wealthy and corporations” (26 percent), and “eliminating the National Weather Service” (25 percent). 

There is a clear split on the likelihood of a national abortion ban under a Trump administration, with 16 percent of battleground constituents believing an abortion ban is one of the most likely outcomes, and 16 percent believing an abortion ban would be one of the least likely outcomes.

  • After reading the policies outlined in Project 2025, two in three battleground constituents continue to oppose Project 2025 (net -39; 25 percent support – 64 percent oppose), including three in five independents (61 percent) and even one in three Republicans (33 percent). 
  • In an open-end question asking about the top concerns constituents have about Project 2025, 20 percent had a general negative reaction to it, while 24 percent said they were concerned by its impact on presidential power (16 percent) or government overreach (8 percent).

Nearly Three in Five Who Engaged With DNC Coverage Had a Positive Reaction

Polling data on Americans’ reactions to the Democratic National Convention, including perceptions of the political parties.

Navigating the Vote: 2024 Presidential Battleground

Polling data on voters in battleground states ahead of the 2024 presidential election, including their views of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.

Americans Increasingly Say Project 2025 Describes What Trump Stands For

Polling data on perceptions of former President Trump’s support for Project 2025 and whether the plan reflects the agenda of Republicans in Congress.

About The Study

Impact Research conducted public opinion surveys among a sample of 1,500 likely 2024 general election voters from August 7-12, 2024. The survey was conducted by text-to-web (100 percent). Respondents were verified against a voter file and special care was taken to ensure the demographic composition of our sample matched that of the 61 congressional districts included in the sample across a variety of demographic variables. The margin of error for the full sample at the 95 percent level of confidence is +/- 2.5 percentage points. The margin for error for subgroups varies and is higher.

Like the info here?

Get it directly in your inbox when new polls are released.

About Navigator

In a world where the news cycle is the length of a tweet, our leaders often lack the real-time public-sentiment analysis to shape the best approaches to talking about the issues that matter the most. Navigator is designed to act as a consistent, flexible, responsive tool to inform policy debates by conducting research and reliable guidance to inform allies, elected leaders, and the press. Navigator is a project led by pollsters from Global Strategy Group and GBAO along with an advisory committee, including: Andrea Purse, progressive strategist; Arkadi Gerney, The Hub Project; Joel Payne, The Hub Project; Christina Reynolds, EMILY’s List; Delvone Michael, Working Families; Felicia Wong, Roosevelt Institute; Mike Podhorzer, AFL-CIO; Jesse Ferguson, progressive strategist; Navin Nayak, Center for American Progress Action Fund; Stephanie Valencia, EquisLabs; and Melanie Newman, Planned Parenthood Action Fund.

For press inquiries contact: press@navigatorresearch.org