Do’s and Don’ts of Communicating about Trump and Republicans’ Budget

June 30, 2025
Rachael Russell, Ian Smith, Maryann Cousens & Camille Keene

Polling report on the latest messaging guidance regarding the Republican budget.

This Navigator Research report covers the latest messaging guidance regarding the Republican budget bill.

The Republican Budget, paves the way for more billionaire giveaways at the expense of middle-class and working people – taking away Medicaid and SNAP that people count on. When communicating about Trump and Republicans’ cuts to programs Americans rely on, it is critical to communicate the real-life consequences of cuts to these programs: tell the story of who and how they’ll be impacted. It’s also critical to make sure people know “why” these cuts are happening, so Trump and Republicans can fund tax breaks for Trump and his billionaire friends.

Read More

October 30, 2025

Government Shutdown Week 4: Message Guidance

Polling report on the latest messaging guidance regarding the government shutdown.

Rachael Russell, Ian Smith, Maryann Cousens & Camille Keene
October 23, 2025

Government Shutdown Week 3: Message Guidance

Polling report on the latest messaging findings around the government shutdown.

Erica Seifert, Rachael Russell, Ian Smith, Maryann Cousens & Camille Keene
June 30, 2025

Do’s and Don’ts of Communicating about Medicaid Cuts

Polling report on the latest messaging guidance regarding the Republican budget.

Rachael Russell, Ian Smith, Maryann Cousens & Camille Keene
March 14, 2025

Navigator’s Guide to Talking about Government Cuts

The latest messaging guidance regarding the cuts to the Federal Government.

Rachael Russell, Ian Smith, Maryann Cousens & Camille Keene
Download
Memo
Share

About The Study

Global Strategy Group conducted a public opinion survey among a sample of 1,000 registered voters from October 23-October 27, 2025. The survey was conducted online, recruiting respondents from an opt-in online panel vendor. Respondents were verified against a voter file and special care was taken to ensure the demographic composition of our sample matched that of the national registered voter population across a variety of demographic variables. The margin of error for the full sample at the 95 percent level of confidence is +/- 3.1 percentage points. The margin of error for subgroups varies and is higher.