MAHA Message Guidance

September 25, 2025
Navigator Research

Messaging guidance on the “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) movement.

MAHA Message Guidance

Messaging guidance on the “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) movement.

The “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) movement blends common-sense health advice with fringe – and sometimes dangerous – ideas. Its leaders say they want to tackle America’s chronic disease crisis and improve wellness, but their proposals often reveal something else: a distrust of science and a readiness to exploit public frustration with the health care system. As Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. remakes the nation’s public health establishment, his agenda leans heavily on two emotional threads: fear of illness and anger at a system people feel is broken.

Navigator Research completed a study of public attitudes towards health and wellness, as well as perceptions of the MAHA movement and what progressive messages appeal most to those in the MAHA-curious cohort. (deck here).

Values

While Robert F. Kennedy may be divisive, an overwhelming majority of Americans across partisanship share common values about health and wellness:

  • The government should make it more affordable for American families to stay healthy.
  • Good health care is a human right that all American families should have access to.
  • It should be easier for every American family to access fresh fruits and vegetables.
  • Maintaining a healthy lifestyle and diet is just as important as regular visits to the doctor.
  • We need to hold corporate polluters accountable and keep them from pouring toxic chemicals into the air we breathe and the water we drink.

Messaging to Meet the Moment

A message that addresses the faults in our health care system and focuses on cracking down on corporate interests persuades Democrats and independents, non-MAGA Republicans, and also “MAHA curious” persuadables.

Our health care system is broken, but the answer is not to cut medical research, take away healthy school meal options from kids, or limit vaccines. Instead we should be cracking down on special interest influence in our government and putting science and facts ahead of politics.

Message Path:

  1. Acknowledge the system is broken: Most Americans are not satisfied with, or confident in, the existing health care system.
  2. Point out that Republicans’ proposed solution is not right: Americans oppose cuts to medical research, taking away healthy school meals from kids, and ending all vaccine mandates.
  3. Provide an alternative: Cracking down on special interest influence in our government is particularly persuasive when talking about health and wellness in the country today.
  4. Lean into common sense consensus solutions: Americans overwhelmingly agree that healthcare should be a right and that government should make it more affordable for people to stay healthy.

Read More

February 20, 2026

Message Guidance on Tariff SCOTUS Ruling

Polling report covering the latest perceptions of tariffs, including the share of Americans who support Trump’s tariff plan and how tariffs are seen as impacting costs.

Navigator Research
February 9, 2026

Do’s and Don’ts about Discussing ICE and Immigration

Do’s and Don’ts about Discussing ICE and Immigration

Navigator Research
February 5, 2026

All eyes are on ICE

This Navigator Research report covers Trump’s handling of immigration and mass deportations as well as messaging guidance on ICE.

Maryann Cousens
October 31, 2025

State of the Shutdown: Families are Paying the Price for GOP Chaos

Messaging guidance around the government shutdown.

Navigator Research
Download
GraphsMemo
Share

About The Study

Global Strategy Group conducted a public opinion survey among a sample of 1,000 registered voters from September 4-September 8, 2025. 100 additional interviews were conducted among Hispanic voters. 100 additional interviews were conducted among African American voters. 75 additional interviews were conducted among Asian American and Pacific Islander voters. 100 additional interviews were conducted among independent voters. The survey was conducted online, recruiting respondents from an opt-in online panel vendor. Respondents were verified against a voter file and special care was taken to ensure the demographic composition of our sample matched that of the national registered voter population across a variety of demographic variables. The margin of error for the full sample at the 95 percent level of confidence is +/- 3.1 percentage points. The margin of error for subgroups varies and is higher.