Post-Election Poll: The Issues That Mattered Most In The Battleground

Wednesday, December 4, 2024 By Rachael Russell
Download Full Report

Exit Poll: Top Issues

This Navigator Research report is the first in a series of releases from our House battleground survey among 2024 voters in closely-divided battleground districts. This release focuses on the key issues that drove vote choice for Congress in these battleground districts, how these issues ranked in saliency, and who voters trust most to handle top issues.

Inflation and immigration were the driving issues for battleground voters.


Inflation, immigration, and threats to democracy were most important issues in choosing who to vote for in closely-divided House districts. Similarly to the national electorate, battleground voters said that inflation and the cost of living (30 percent) was the top priority when deciding who to vote for in the U.S. Congress, followed by immigration and the border (28 percent) and threats to democracy (27 percent). Immigration and inflation and the cost of living were the top priorities for those voting for Republican congressional candidates (53 percent and 49 percent, respectively) while those who voted for the Democratic congressional candidate prioritized threats to democracy (48 percent) and abortion (32 percent).

  • Among a list of issues, inflation and the cost of living was selected as the issue that mattered when deciding which candidate to support for Congress (87 percent, including 67 percent who said it mattered “a great deal”), followed by taxes (85 percent, including 56 percent who said it mattered “a great deal”), Social Security and Medicare (82 percent, including 53 percent who said it mattered “a great deal”), guns (76 percent, including 54 percent who said it mattered “a great deal”), and immigration (75 percent, including 56 percent who said it mattered “a great deal”). 
  • The most important traits seen as mattering most when deciding which candidate to support for Congress included the candidate’s personal character and values (86 percent, including 64 percent who said it mattered “a great deal”), the candidate’s political party (75 percent, including 49 percent who said it mattered “a great deal”), and whether the candidate was committed to accepting the results of the 2024 election (64 percent, including 52 percent who said it mattered “a great deal”).
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Inflation and Immigration Were Top Issues for Republican Voters; Democratic Voters Said Threats to Democracy and Abortion
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Beyond Economic Issues, Immigration Was a Key Issue for Independents and Blue Collar Workers
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Late Deciders Were More Concerned About Democrats Being Too Extreme Than Republicans

Stay in the loop! Sign up to receive our latest polling reports.

Voters were more concerned about Republicans’ stance on abortion than Democrats’ stance on immigration and transgender rights.


By a 15-point margin, voters were more concerned about Republicans’ position on abortion (47 percent concerned) over Democrats’ position on transgender people (32 percent concerned), including independents by 10 points (45 percent Republicans’ stance concerning – 35 percent Democrats’ stance concerning). Voters were also more concerned by 10 points about Republicans’ position on abortion (48 percent) over Democrats’ position on immigration and the border (35 percent); however, Democrats’ stance on immigration is more concerning to independents (net -7; 40 percent Republicans’ stance concerning – 47 percent Democrats’ stance concerning). 

  • A majority of voters who didn’t vote for Republican congressional candidates were most concerned that the Republican would be a rubber stamp for Donald Trump (55 percent), followed by their stance on abortion (21 percent), and being too extreme (14 percent). Voters who didn’t vote for the Democratic congressional candidate were similarly most concerned about the Democrat being a rubber stamp for Kamala Harris (48 percent), over being too extreme (19 percent) or their stance on issues, like immigration (11 percent).
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Voters Were More Concerned About Republicans’ Stance on Abortion Than Democrats’ Stance on Immigration or Trans Issues
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Blue Collar Voters and Late Deciders Were More Concerned About Democrats on Immigration Than Republicans’ Stance on Abortion
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: A Majority of Voters Who Didn’t Vote for the Republican Were Most Concerned About Them Being Trump’s Rubber Stamp
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Voters Who Didn’t Vote for the Democratic Candidate Were Most Concerned About Them Being a Rubber Stamp for Harris

Voters heard most about Democrats’ stance on abortion and Republicans’ stances on immigration and crime.


Voters heard the most by far about Democratic congressional candidates’ stance on abortion (70 percent heard “a lot” or “some”), distantly followed by their position on making the wealthy pay their fair share in taxes (53 percent heard “a lot” or “some”) and economic security for the middle class (44 percent heard “a lot” or “some”). On Republican congressional candidates’ stances, voters heard most about immigration and the border (67 percent heard “a lot” or “some”), crime (57 percent heard “a lot” or “some”), abortion (56 percent heard “a lot” or “some”), and the cost of living (50 percent heard “a lot” or “some”).

  • Battleground voters decisively believed Democratic candidates would support policies that will protect abortion rights over Republicans by 60 points (72 percent Democratic candidates – 12 percent Republican candidates). Voters also believed Republicans were more likely to support policies that will lower taxes for the wealthy (net -38; 17 percent Democratic candidates – 55 percent Republican candidates). 
  • Voters were more split on whether Democrats or Republicans candidates “care about people like me” (net +4; 45 percent Democratic candidates – 41 percent Republican candidates), is a strong leader (net -1; 39 percent Democratic candidates – 40 percent Republican candidates), or is too extreme (net -3; 41 percent Democratic candidates – 44 percent Republican candidates).
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Outside of Economic Issues, Voters Heard Most About Democratic Candidates’ Positions on Abortion
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Immigration and Crime Were the Issues Voters Heard About Republican Candidates’ Stances Most Beyond Economic Issues
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Voters Viewed Democratic Candidates as More Honest and Trustworthy and Caring About People Like Them
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Late Deciders Were More Likely to View Republicans as Caring About People Like Them by 16 Points

Read More

2024 Post-Election Survey: Ideological Debates in the Election

Polling data on the top issues for voters going into the 2024 election and attitudes voters had on a variety of different ideological debates at stake in the election.

2024 Post-Election Survey: A Majority of New Trump Voters Used Social Media as Main News Source

Report on the 2024 election media environment, including the electorate’s news sources and the most popular social media platforms among swing voters.

2024 Post-Election Survey: The Reasons for Voting for Trump and Harris

Polling data on voters’ top reasons for supporting Donald Trump or Kamala Harris, including perceptions of how each candidate prioritized issues.

About The Study

Impact Research conducted public opinion surveys among a sample of 1,500 likely 2024 general election voters from November 2 - 6, 2024. The survey was conducted by text-to-web (100 percent). Respondents were verified against a voter file and special care was taken to ensure the demographic composition of our sample matched that of the 61 congressional districts included in the sample across a variety of demographic variables. The margin of error for the full sample at the 95 percent level of confidence is +/- 2.5 percentage points. The margin for error for subgroups varies and is higher.

Like the info here?

Get it directly in your inbox when new polls are released.

About Navigator

In a world where the news cycle is the length of a tweet, our leaders often lack the real-time public-sentiment analysis to shape the best approaches to talking about the issues that matter the most. Navigator is designed to act as a consistent, flexible, responsive tool to inform policy debates by conducting research and reliable guidance to inform allies, elected leaders, and the press. Navigator is a project led by pollsters from Global Strategy Group and GBAO along with an advisory committee, including: Andrea Purse, progressive strategist; Arkadi Gerney, The Hub Project; Joel Payne, The Hub Project; Christina Reynolds, EMILY’s List; Delvone Michael, Working Families; Felicia Wong, Roosevelt Institute; Mike Podhorzer, AFL-CIO; Jesse Ferguson, progressive strategist; Navin Nayak, Center for American Progress Action Fund; Stephanie Valencia, EquisLabs; and Melanie Newman, Planned Parenthood Action Fund.

For press inquiries contact: press@navigatorresearch.org