Post-Election Poll: What Happened in Democratic and Republican Won Districts

Thursday, December 5, 2024 By Rachael Russell
Download Full Report

Exit Poll: The Political Parties

This Navigator Research report analyzes the districts won by Democrats and Republicans, including what voters in these districts heard from each party, and what messages resonated or fell short.

The margin of victory was narrow in the congressional battleground with Republicans eking out a majority.


The congressional battleground was competitive, with Republicans receiving 50 percent of the vote to the Democrats’ 49 percent. In districts that Democrats won, they won by 7 points (53 percent Democratic candidate – 46 percent Republican candidate), while Republicans won by 9 points (45 percent Democratic candidate – 54 percent Republican candidate). 

  • The greatest concern about both Republican and Democratic candidates was that they would be a rubber stamp for either Trump or Harris, however voters were more concerned that the Republican congressional candidates would be a rubber stamp for Donald Trump in both Republican won and Democratic won districts (54 percent), than the Democratic candidate being a rubber stamp for Kamala Harris in both Republican won (47 percent) and Democratic won districts (46 percent).
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: The Congressional Battleground Was Competitive, With Republican Candidates Winning 50% Compared to Democrats’ 49%
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: A Majority Voted in Support of a Candidate Rather Than in Opposition to a Candidate
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Beyond Partisanship, Candidates’ Personal Traits and Values Were Top Reasons Voters Chose Not to Vote for Them
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: A Plurality of Voters Who Didn’t Vote for the Democratic Candidate Were Concerned They Would Be Too Aligned With Harris
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Voters Were Even More Concerned That Republican Candidates Would Align Behind Trump and Also Had Concerns About Abortion

Voters in Democratic-won districts heard more about abortion, tax fairness, and economic security.


In the districts that Democrats won, the voters were more likely to hear from the Democratic candidate about abortion, tax fairness, and economic security than voters in districts that Republicans won. Voters in Democratic won districts heard a lot or some from Democrats about abortion (net +6; 73 percent Democrat wins – 67 percent Republican wins), making the wealthy pay their fair share (net +7; 56 percent Democrat wins – 49 percent Republican wins), economic security for the middle class (net +5; 47 percent Democrat wins – 41 percent Republican wins), and prescription drug costs (net +6; 44 percent Democrat wins – 38 percent Republican wins). Voters in districts where Republicans won heard more about Democrats’ position on immigration (net +6; 42 percent Democrat wins – 48 percent Republican wins), but less about Democrats on crime (net +7; 39 percent Democrat wins – 32 percent Republican wins) and issues related to transgender people (net +6; 39 percent Democrat wins – 37 percent Republican wins).

  • In the districts that Democrats won, the Democratic candidate had roughly even standing on policies that will hurt the economy (net -1) and policies that increase energy costs for people like me (net +2). On the other hand, in the districts Republican-won people did not trust Democrats on the economy and they were seen as more likely than Republicans to support policies that will hurt the economy (net +7) and increase costs for people like me (net +6).
  • Democrats in Democratic-won districts were perceived as more bipartisan and a strong leader: Democrats were 15 points more likely to be seen as willing to work across the aisle to get things done compared to Republicans, 8 points more likely to be seen as a strong leader, and 10 points more likely to be seen as honest and trustworthy. Democrats were underwater on all of these traits in Republican-won districts.
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: In Democratic Won Districts, Voters Heard More About Abortion, Fair Taxes, and Economic Security Than in Ones They Lost
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Democrats Were Able to Make the Case That They Cared More About Voters and Were Independent in Districts They Won
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: In Democratic Won Districts, They Were Able to Fight Republicans to a Draw on Inflation and the Economy

In Democratic wins, voters heard more positive than negative information about the candidate by 20 points.


In districts that Democrats won, 45 percent say they heard mostly positive ads and information about Democratic candidates, while 24 percent say they heard mostly negative information. In Republican won districts, news about the Democratic candidates were much more split, 32 percent say they heard positive ads and information while 26 percent heard negative information. In districts Republicans won, information about Republicans was split between positive and negative news (33 percent positive – 32 percent negative), while Democratic won districts heard more negative information about Republican candidates by 22 points (19 percent positive – 41 percent negative). 

  • Voters recalled hearing ads about the Democratic candidate sharing their values, more so in districts Democrats won (18 percent), than lost (11 percent). Voters heard more negative ads about the Democrats in districts they lost (23 percent), compared to districts they won (16 percent). Ads about Republican candidates largely focused on them being pro-life both in Democratic won districts (27 percent) and Republican won districts (24 percent). Negative traits were other top ads voters heard about Republicans in both districts Democrats won (23 percent) and Republicans won (25 percent).
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: In Democratic Wins, Voters Heard More Positive Information by Over 20 Points Compared to 6 Points More in Districts They Lost
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: Voters Heard More About Democratic Candidates’ Negative Traits in Districts They Lost Than Ones They Won
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: By a Two-to-One Margin, Voters Heard Negative Information About Republican Candidates in Districts Democrats Won
Bar graph of polling data from Navigator Research. Title: A Quarter of Voters Who Heard Information About the Republican Candidate Heard About Them Being Anti-Abortion

Read More

2024 Post-Election Survey: Racial Analysis of 2024 Election Results

Polling report on how racial groups voted in the 2024 election, including what issues mattered most and how vote shares compared to the 2020 election.

Even as Some Voters Were Skeptical of a National Ban, Abortion Messaging Helped Win Key Senate Races

Interested parties memo on abortion rights as a key issues and its role in the 2024 election.

Post-Election Poll: How Economic Issues Played Out in House Battleground Districts in the Election

Polling data on perceptions of where the Republican and Democratic Parties stand on inflation, the cost of living, and the broader economy.

About The Study

Impact Research conducted public opinion surveys among a sample of 1,500 likely 2024 general election voters from November 2 - 6, 2024. The survey was conducted by text-to-web (100 percent). Respondents were verified against a voter file and special care was taken to ensure the demographic composition of our sample matched that of the 61 congressional districts included in the sample across a variety of demographic variables. The margin of error for the full sample at the 95 percent level of confidence is +/- 2.5 percentage points. The margin for error for subgroups varies and is higher.

Like the info here?

Get it directly in your inbox when new polls are released.

About Navigator

In a world where the news cycle is the length of a tweet, our leaders often lack the real-time public-sentiment analysis to shape the best approaches to talking about the issues that matter the most. Navigator is designed to act as a consistent, flexible, responsive tool to inform policy debates by conducting research and reliable guidance to inform allies, elected leaders, and the press. Navigator is a project led by pollsters from Global Strategy Group and GBAO along with an advisory committee, including: Andrea Purse, progressive strategist; Arkadi Gerney, The Hub Project; Joel Payne, The Hub Project; Christina Reynolds, EMILY’s List; Delvone Michael, Working Families; Felicia Wong, Roosevelt Institute; Mike Podhorzer, AFL-CIO; Jesse Ferguson, progressive strategist; Navin Nayak, Center for American Progress Action Fund; Stephanie Valencia, EquisLabs; and Melanie Newman, Planned Parenthood Action Fund.

For press inquiries contact: press@navigatorresearch.org