• Polling

Views of AI and data centers

Tuesday, December 16, 2025 By Rachael Russell, Ian Smith & Maryann Cousens

Poll: AI and Data Centers

TOPLINES | GRAPHS

This Navigator Research report covers perceptions of AI and data centers in the country today.

BIG TAKEAWAYS:

  • Americans’ perception of AI is varied, with the greatest divide split by gender and age. Half say they are using AI tools once a week or more.
  • There is significant support for increased AI regulation—one of the few issues that transcends similar support levels regardless of party.
  • When it comes to building more data centers, an approach that protects consumers from both the high costs and environmental consequences is most appealing.

Views toward AI

Americans’ perception of artificial intelligence or AI is varied, with young men viewing it the most positively. 49% of Americans have a favorable view of AI, this jumps to 57% for men overall, and 63% for men under the age of 55. Women on the other hand view AI unfavorably by 7 points (41% favorable – 48% unfavorable). Younger women are nearly even on the issue (net -2), while women over the age of 55 view AI unfavorably by 9 points. Younger Americans and voters of color generally have a more positive view of AI.

Bar chart from Navigator Research, titled: Men, Particularly Younger Men, Are Most Favorable to AI

Despite the fact that AI favorability favors younger and men, Republicans view AI more favorably (net +17) than Democrats (net +2) and independents (net -8), the partisan divide is less disparate around AI than most other issues facing the country.

Bar chart from Navigator Research, titled: College-Educated, White Collar, Republican, and Higher-Income Americans Most Favorable to AI

Educational attainment, job type, and income also play a role: Americans with a college degree, those who work white collar jobs, and those living in households that earn more than $100,000 per year all view AI more favorably. Those who use AI frequently, either daily or weekly, are far more favorable towards it than those who don’t.

The groups who report viewing AI most favorably also say they use it the most. While half of Americans say they use AI tools like ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, or DALL-E once a week or more, 15% are using these tools several times a day. 18% of men report using AI tools several times a day, jumping to 23% for men under the age of 55.

Bar chart from Navigator Research, titled: Majorities Say They Are Frequent AI Users: Nearly Half Report Using It Once a Week or More

When it comes to AI, while most Americans are generally comfortable with it, most also say either use it with caution or have concerns about it. Regardless of usage, Americans are mixed about whether the way AI is being used right now is good or bad for the country and for “people like you.”

Bar chart from Navigator Research, titled: A Majority of America Is Somewhere in the Middle on AI — Neither Very Comfortable Nor Very Uncomfortable

AI as a Political Issue

Americans also don’t see either party as having an advantage on the issue. Just 23% say they trust Democrats to handle AI, while 25% say they trust Republicans more—revealing a large opportunity. A majority either trust neither party or say they don’t know who to trust.

Bar chart from Navigator Research, titled: Few Prioritize AI as a Top Issue Right Now; Many Don’t Trust Either Party to Handle the Issue Yet

There is bipartisan support for more regulation of AI. When it comes to AI, 60% say there should be more regulation to limit its potential negative impact on society, including 63% of Democrats, 59% of Republicans, and 52% of independents. Even among those who view AI favorably, a majority say there should be more regulation.

Bar chart from Navigator Research, titled: Americans Widely Prefer Greater AI Regulation, Including Bipartisan Majorities and Both Users and Non-Users of AI

Data Centers

The building of new data centers doesn’t yet evoke strong feelings nationally. A majority say they have heard little or nothing about building new data centers in America, and even fewer have heard about potential data centers being built in their own communities. Americans living in the midwest are hearing more about the building of new data centers both nationally and in their own communities.

Bar chart from Navigator Research, titled: Most Americans Are Not Hearing Much About the Discussion on Data Centers, Either Nationally or in Their Communities

Given the lack of awareness about data centers, Americans don’t have a strong sense that they are good or bad for the country or for the communities where they are located. Most Americans say data centers are either an equal mix of good or bad or that they are not sure, indicating an opportunity to engage on the issue.

Bar chart from Navigator Research, titled: Opinions Are Not Yet Strongly Formed About the Impact of Data Centers Locally or Nationally

Ultimately, Americans’ are split and unsure of whether they would support the building of a data center in their local community (36% support – 32% oppose – 32% unsure). While Republicans are more supportive (net +15) than Democrats (net -5) and independents (net -4), most Republicans either say they would oppose it or are unsure. Those who view AI favorably are less likely to believe data centers are far more supportive of building new data centers in their own community (52% support – 21% oppose).

Bar chart from Navigator Research, titled: Support for Building New Data Centers Locally Is Mixed; Americans Who Use AI Are More Supportive

The greatest concern Americans have about data centers focuses on the impact it would have on the community, chiefly that data centers will use up too much energy and raise utility costs for local residents. This is most concerning across partisanship and racial demographics. The most appealing potential benefits are high-paying, union jobs and growth to local economies and tax revenue.

Bar chart from Navigator Research, titled: The Greatest Concern Across Party Lines on Data Centers Is Higher Utility Costs

When it comes to building more data centers, an approach that protects consumers from both environmental consequences and higher costs associated with them is more appealing than one that solely aims to slow or stop the construction of data centers.

In response to an argument that “we should encourage more building of data centers so that we can boost our economy, create good-paying local jobs, and stay competitive with countries like China on technology and economic development,” there is a 40 point difference between the rebuttals:

  • As we build more data centers, we should do it in a way that protects consumers and our environment and makes sure that tech companies pay their fair share instead of passing the costs onto consumers (net +44)
  • We should try to slow or stop the rampant construction of data centers because they drain local energy, hurt our economy and our health, raise costs for consumers, and make tech billionaires even richer (net +4)
Bar chart from Navigator Research, titled: Americans Prefer a Balanced Approach That Builds Data Centers While Protecting Consumers Over an Anti-Data Center Approach

Read More

2025 Wrapped: Trump’s Year in Review

Polling report on the latest views of Trump and his administration’s actions over the last year.

In Time for the Holidays, Americans Say Costs Are Going up – on Everything

Polling report on the latest views of the affordability crisis, including specific costs Americans say are increasing and how increased costs are impacting financial habits.

Focus Group Report: Working Class Americans and the Affordability Crisis

Focus group report on working class Americans in Senate battleground states on their personal financial situations, their greatest economic concerns, and perceptions of elected officials tackling affordability.

About The Study

Global Strategy Group conducted a public opinion survey among a sample of 1,000 registered voters from December 4-December 8, 2025. 100 additional interviews were conducted among Hispanic voters. 102 additional interviews were conducted among African American voters. 78 additional interviews were conducted among Asian American and Pacific Islander voters. 102 additional interviews were conducted among independent voters. The survey was conducted online, recruiting respondents from an opt-in online panel vendor. Respondents were verified against a voter file and special care was taken to ensure the demographic composition of our sample matched that of the national registered voter population across a variety of demographic variables. The margin of error for the full sample at the 95 percent level of confidence is +/- 3.1 percentage points. The margin of error for subgroups varies and is higher.

Like the info here?

Get it directly in your inbox when new polls are released.

About Navigator

In a world where the news cycle is the length of a tweet, our leaders often lack the real-time public-sentiment analysis to shape the best approaches to talking about the issues that matter the most. Navigator is designed to act as a consistent, flexible, responsive tool to inform policy debates by conducting research and reliable guidance to inform allies, elected leaders, and the press. Navigator is a project led by pollsters from Global Strategy Group and GBAO along with an advisory committee, including: Andrea Purse, progressive strategist; Arkadi Gerney, The Hub Project; Joel Payne, The Hub Project; Christina Reynolds, EMILY’s List; Delvone Michael, Working Families; Felicia Wong, Roosevelt Institute; Mike Podhorzer, AFL-CIO; Jesse Ferguson, progressive strategist; Navin Nayak, Center for American Progress Action Fund; Stephanie Valencia, EquisLabs; and Melanie Newman, Planned Parenthood Action Fund.

For press inquiries contact: press@navigatorresearch.org